🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Sum in Compensation against Clearing House Regarding Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine. The Substantial Demand Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability. The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves. Dispute on Ownership European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal actions, including confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Wider Implications With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Enforcement Challenges Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm. European Safeguards EU officials indicated they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected. Ukraine would solely be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget. This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."