🔗 Share this article Families' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones. A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades. A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground. “You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Peril Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated. “It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.” She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Seeking Solutions and Certainty The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious. Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near. “It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.” It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.” “Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.” The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.